That's not ENTIRELY true... The protocol decided to excempt developed countries, which incidentally include India and China. However, I get your point as this editorial says:
Its supporters say Kyoto is a symbolic first step. But how many first steps have their already been. Who remembers the Rio Earth Summit of 1992 or its decisions? No one, because they were ignored. Kyoto is doomed too, not just because it does not include the US, but also because it does include China, India, and Brazil. If global gas emissions are to be reduced, they all have to be brought into the equation.
You also have to understand that most of the Chinese people aren't extremely rich, and in countries of such large populations, you need as cheap as (and its easy to find) possible labour and fuels to suceed, which sadly damages the environment. Find a solution?
8th KK posse member
Originally Posted by Ardnax
Don't listen to Jet, he's mean to everybody.
Playing now on Winamp